Legal Opinion

Whalen v. Albertsons Companies Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 20, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00459Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHRISTINE WHALEN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00459-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ALBERTSONS COMPANIES INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 96, 97 Defendants. The motions to dismiss are granted because the plaintiffs have failed to allege Article III standing. This order assumes the reader’s familiarity with the factual allegations, the relevant law, and the parties’ arguments. The plaintiffs have again failed to provide enough information about their own situations to adequately allege that they are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. H.J. Heinz Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  2. Saint Alphonsus Medical Center-Nampa Inc. v. St. Luke's Health System, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API