Legal Opinion

Eaves v. Keeton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Dent County Circuit Court. — -Hon. L. B. Woodside, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

This suit on a promissory' note involves the right of the holder to have judgment against *426the appealing defendant, J. W. Keeton, as endorser. When we speak of defendant we mean J. W. Keeton, unless otherwise indicated. The record discloses that one Claud Wood is the maker of the note and _ Joseph E. Burgess is the payee. Such payee sold or traded the note to W. R. Keeton for a team of mules at or about the time of its date and endorsed the same in blank by writing his name on the back of such note. Shortly thereafter the defendant, J. W. Keeton, father of W. R. Keeton, having the note in his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. McCune v. BeltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Murray v. YatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  4. Pier v. HeinrichshoffenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Rolla State Bank v. PezoldtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Case v. McKinnisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Borserine v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. State Bank of Fisk v. Omega Electronics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Quackenboss v. HarbaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Aufderheide v. MoellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API