Legal Opinion

Allen v. Lenox Hill Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

On this record, we cannot conclude, as a matter of law, that defendant Bahr did not deviate from accepted medical practice, *359or that such alleged deviation did not contribute to plaintiff patient’s injuring accident "in any way” (Joseph v New York City Tr. Auth., 149 AD2d 669). There are triable issues of fact including that of defendant-appellant’s asserted negligent failure to take steps to restrain plaintiff or to alert his co-defendant "covering” physician of aspects of plaintiff patient’s condition and recent behavior that might have prompted co-defendant to use restraints on the patient…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Joseph v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API