Legal Opinion

Shockley v. Williamson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1992No. 49A05-9112-CV-436PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Lerman C. Shockley appeals the trial court's judgment denying his motion for relief from judgment. Ind. Trial Rule 60(B)(1).

We affirm.

Shockley presents one issue for our review:

whether the trial court erred in deny-img his motion for relief from judgment.

On May 6, 1989, Shockley and Defendant-Appellee Alvin D. Williamson were involved in an automobile accident. On July 21, 1989, Shockley filed a complaint for damages, alleging Williamson's negligence caused the accident. He notified State Farm Insurance Company, Williamson's automobile insurer, on May 24,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chelovich v. Ruff & Silvian AgencyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Fulton v. Van SlykeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Geiger & Peters, Inc. v. American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Crawfordsville v. ColingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Poteet v. BethkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Robinson v. TurnerDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
  4. Meyer v. MeyerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Ehrlich v. ThayerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API