Legal Opinion

Hanks v. Pearce

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Levy and claim. Before Judge Butt. Muscogee superior court. November term, 1893.

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

Section 2914 of the code, which declares how and in what manner and by what means a judgment may be saved from dormancy, has always heretofore received a liberal and equitable construction, the judges early departing from the letter of the statute and interpreting it according to its reason and spirit. Hence, during the long period of its existence as a statute, many occasions have arisen for its application to the facts of particular cases; and accordingly the decisions of this court have taken a wide range in treating this statute and applying it so as to give full force…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gholston v. O'KelleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Smith v. RustSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Hatcher v. A. Gammell & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  4. Hitch v. LambrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. Pullen (In Re Pullen)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API