Legal Opinion

Holtz v. S. Landow Fruit Produce Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This was an action to recover the balance of the purchase price of several lots of merchandise alleged to have been sold to the defendant and upon its president’s order shipped to the Virginia Novelty Company. The defendant’s answer denied that it owed anything to the plaintiff, and pleaded specially that though it authorized him to charge it for the original order of March, 1937, but $11.73 remained unpaid thereon, and it never authorized or agreed to be responsible for the other items in the complaint. The court gave judgment for the plaintiff to recover $681.20 damages. By its assignments…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas Gordon Malting Co. v. Bartels Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Bartolotta v. CalvoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Lewis v. Clyde Steamship Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Pennsylvania-Dixie Cement Corp. v. H. Wales Lines Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Conowingo Land Co. v. McGawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Home Oil Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Harborwalk v. Errato, No. 69638 (May 20, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API