Stevens v. Stevens
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*874Child support payments may be waived prospectively, before the obligation to make such payments has accrued (see Matter of O’Connor v Curcio, 281 AD2d 100 [2001]). The party claiming a waiver must come forward with evidence of a voluntary and intentional relinquishment of a known and otherwise enforceable right to child support (see Matter of Barrio v Montanez, 71 AD3d 1140 [2010]). We agree with the Supreme Court that while the evidence supports a finding that the plaintiff waived her right to child support for the parties’ son, upon their agreement for the defendant to take physical custody…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O' Connor v. CurcioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Barrio v. MontanezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wendel v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Hinck v. HinckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Hinck v. HinckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Luken v. LukenNew York Supreme Court · 2015
- Tafuro v. TafuroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.