Legal Opinion
Saunders v. Capital Health System at Mercer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 5, 2008PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
942 A.2d 142 (2008)
398 N.J. Super. 500
Montee SAUNDERS, a minor, by her Guardian ad Litem, Montreal SAUDERS, and Montreal Saunders, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM AT MERCER, and Marietta Cahill, CNM, Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 28, 2008.
Decided March 5, 2008.
Alan Roth, Newark, argued the cause for appellants (Bendit Weinstock, attorneys, West Orange; Mr. Roth and Abbott S. Brown, on the brief).
Elena B. Zuares, Marlton, argued the cause for respondents (Parker McCay, attorneys; Stacy L. Moore, Jr., of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- O'CONNELL v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Knorr v. SmealSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alpert, Goldberg v. QuinnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Paragon Contractors, Inc. v. Peachtree Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- A.T. v. CohenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Triarsi v. BSC GROUP SERVICES, LLC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Stoecker v. EchevarriaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.