Legal Opinion

Davis v. City of Clinton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 6, 1882PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court. Action of mandanms to compel the council of the city, of Clinton to move or have moved certain obstructions in an alleged public highway. Trial to the court. The relief asked was refused, and the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

The pleadings are voluminous. It is deemed unnecessary to state at length the several allegations therein, because we think the case can be satisfactorily disposed of by considering the several grounds upon which counsel for appellant claims the judgment of the Circuit Court to be erroneous. It is conceded the hearing in this court can only be had upon the errors assigned. The material controverted question is, as to the existence of a highway at the place where it is alleged to be obstructed, sixty-six feet wide.

1. HIGHWAY : by prescription: width of. I. It is said the evidence shows the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. . CaywoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Manderschid v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Camp v. CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824
  4. Epler v. NimanIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  5. McIntire v. Norwich Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Whitesides v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State Ex Rel. Game, Forestation & Parks Commission v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bayard v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Bangert v. Osceola CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Illinois Steel Co. v. JekaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API