Legal Opinion

Stoner v. Fryett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1916No. 13196PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kitsap county, French, J., entered September 8, 1915, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for specific performance, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought to compel specific performance of a contract for the exchange of real estate.

On January 25, 1915, the plaintiffs were the owners of two lots, in the town of Toppenish, and the defendants were the owners of a house and lot in the town of Bremerton. On that date, they entered into a written contract for the exchange of their properties. The agreement provided that each party should furnish to the other an abstract of title and, within ten days thereafter, clear up any defects in their titles.

The plaintiffs allege in their complaint that they delivered to the defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gerard-Fillio Co. v. McNairWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kelly Springfield Tire Co. v. FaulknerWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Woolen v. SloanWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Clements v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. McInnis v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Mogul Logging Co. v. Smith Livesey Wright Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API