Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. SCOTT ALAN ST. GEORGE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2016No. SD33876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMary W. Sheffield, C.J.

Scott Alan St. George (“Defendant”) appeals from his convictions of one count of first-degree burglary, one count of second-degree burglary, two counts of stealing, one count of identity theft, and one count of forgery. Defendant argues the trial court erred in granting the State’s motion to consolidate the charges into one case for trial. Defendant’s argument is without merit, and his convictions and sentences are affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

Katy St. George (“Katy”) 1 has six children, one of whom is Defendant. Katy has owned St. George’s Donut Shop since 1971. At the time of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis WernerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. State v. BechholdMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. LoveMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. STATE OF MISSOURI v. RODNEY J. GREENMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROBERT C. ROSTMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API