Legal Opinion
Steinert v. City of Covina
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 2006No. B187940PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZELON, J.
Stephanie Steinert, a police officer for the City of Covina whose employment was terminated for misconduct, filed a petition for writ of administrative mandamus alleging that she was denied the protections of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq. 1 ) (the Act) while she was being interrogated by her supervisor. The trial court denied her petition, and she appeals. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Steinert was a police officer for the Covina Police Department. Her name arose as part of a routine informal audit performed by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- SFPP, L.P. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Shafer v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
3Cited by10 opinions
- Paterson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Van Winkle v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Blue v. Cal. Office of the Inspector Gen., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Perez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.