Legal Opinion

Benner v. Elliott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1840PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Elliott sued Benner in covenant. The action is founded on an agreement by which, in consideration, &c., the defendant agreed to build a mill-dam for the *452plaintiff, and insured it to stand for one year from the time of its completion; breach, that the dam was so carelessly built, that it was washed away before the time expired for which it was insured to stand. There are five special pleas. Issues to the country on the first, second, and fourth pleas.

The third plea is as follows: That after the dam was finished, and before it was -washed away, the plaintiff^ of his own accord and without the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barrell v. ChrismanIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Ruble v. BuntingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API