Legal Opinion
United States v. Renfroe
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 21, 1990No. Crim. A. No. 86-23-JRRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, District Judge.
Defendant, Adam Renfroe, was convicted on June 12, 1986, of bribing a witness in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(d) and obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503. At the sentencing hearing on July 28,1986, the issue of Renfroe’s competency at the time of trial and sentencing was raised for the first time. The court denied Renfroe’s motion to conduct a competency hearing, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241. On appeal, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals *204found that, on the basis of the evidence presented, there was reasonable cause to believe that Renfroe was not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. John Digilio, in No. 75-2218. Appeal of Harry Lupo, in No. 75-2219. Appeal of Peter Szwandrak, in No. 75-2220Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Renfroe, Adam O., Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. RenfroeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of RenfroeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997