Legal Opinion

Department of Public Utilities v. Freedom of Information Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 2, 1999No. AC 18549PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HENNESSY, J.

The plaintiff department of public utilities of the city of Norwich (Norwich) appeals from the judgment of the trial court upholding an order of the defendant freedom of information commission (commission)1 requiring the plaintiff to disclose a study concerning the cost of serving a particular customer (study). Norwich specifically claims that the court improperly held that the study is not exempt from disclosure as a trade secret2 pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 1-19 (b) (5), now § 1-210 (b) (5).3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*529The following facts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Triangle Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. Town & Country House & Homes Service, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  4. Board of Education v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Ottochian v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Iowa Film Production Services Mississippi Films, Inc. Polynation Pictures, Inc. Field of Screams, LLC Underground Films, Inc. Ticket Out Productions Tricoast Iowa Productions, LLC Gpx Development, LLC September Productions LLC Lucky Mp, LLC and Recess Film Production, LLC v. Iowa Department of Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Director, Department of Information Technology v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Carey D. Moore v. Michael L. Kinney, Warden of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Carey D. Moore v. Michael L. Kinney, Warden of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. Carey Dean Moore v. Michael L. KinneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API