Drislane v. State

This is an action in which three claims have been consolidated for the reason that each requests payment of rent allegedly due under a lease terminated by the State prior to its expiration date. Each claim is for rental due for certain periods after the termination until the expiration date set in the lease.

The claimant has testified that no part of the said claims has been assigned.

*106The decision herein necessarily rests upon the interpretation of clause 3 of the said lease. The State rested on claimant’s case and moved to dismiss on the merits. Decision was reserved.

The claimant, William E.…