Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Moss

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 17, 1908No. 6750PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Gage, J., Orangeburg, Action by Jane Wilson against Adam H. Moss, receiver of partnership of Mr. and Mrs. D. S. Wilson.

Read the full summary

Before Gage, J., Orangeburg, Action by Jane Wilson against Adam H. Moss, receiver of partnership of Mr. and Mrs. D. S. Wilson. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. cites: Evidence as to circumstances of formation of partnership not admissible: 74 S. C., 30; 78 N. Y., 95; 52 S. C., 1. Charge on facts: 31 S. C., 218; 39 S, C., 23; 41 S. €., 440; 48 S. C., 136; 53 S. C., 51; 47 S. C., 488; 32 S. C., 410. Contract within scope of partnership: 16- S. C., 231. Assent of partners will be presumed to a course of dealing known to them: 31 Ark., 113; 30 S. C., 121, 285; 19 & C., 307; 26 S.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an action to- recover the sum of one thousand and eighteen dollars, for services alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiff as a household servant to her brother, D. S. Wilson, and his wife, Angie C. Wilson, formerly doing business as copartners under the firm name of Mr. & Mrs. D. S. Wilson, between- the first day of January, 1896, and the thirty-first day of December, 1902, as will more fully appear by reference to the case of Wilson v. Wilson, 74 S. C., 30, the record of which was introduced in evidence. The jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sims v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  2. Martin v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  3. State v. MaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Harrell v. Columbia Electric Street Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API