Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Saenz

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 28, 1992No. 13-90-072-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

General Motors Corporation (GM) challenges a jury verdict finding it liable under theories of strict liability and negligence for failing to adequately warn users against overloading a GM truck cab and chassis. The key issues concern whether the truck’s subsequent modification exonerates GM from liability. We affirm.

GM manufactured and sold a Chevrolet C-50 cab and chassis in 1972. The truck was sold bare, without a body. After the sale, the buyer installed an apparatus designed for towing trucks. The truck served this purpose for fifteen years.

The towing equipment…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. GMC v. Saenz on Behalf of SaenzTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Franklin v. BlackmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. TCA Building Co. v. Northwestern Resources Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
  4. MacIas v. Ramos, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. Brown v. Hopkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API