Legal Opinion

Litwinavage v. Schuylkill Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1924No. Appeal, No. 104Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

A track of the defendant electric railway company, extending from Shenandoah, passes near the entrance to a coal mine of the Philadelphia and Reading Coal and Iron Company. TO' accommodate miners going to and from work, defendant has there a regular stop called “Maple Hill,” where, to facilitate the entrance and exit of passengers, there is, on a level with the track, a platform about four feet wide. At quitting time miners in considerable numbers gather on and about the platform and do some jostling as they board a car. On the afternoon of March 27,1919,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Murray v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Burrell Township v. UncapherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Wood v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Jordan v. EiseleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API