Litwinavage v. Schuylkill Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
A track of the defendant electric railway company, extending from Shenandoah, passes near the entrance to a coal mine of the Philadelphia and Reading Coal and Iron Company. TO' accommodate miners going to and from work, defendant has there a regular stop called “Maple Hill,” where, to facilitate the entrance and exit of passengers, there is, on a level with the track, a platform about four feet wide. At quitting time miners in considerable numbers gather on and about the platform and do some jostling as they board a car. On the afternoon of March 27,1919,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Murray v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Burrell Township v. UncapherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Wood v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Jordan v. EiseleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.