Zurbrick v. Woodhead
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
Once more we are impelled to direct attention to the toll in human anguish which so often follows that literal reading of the Immigration Act by which every departure from the United States, however brief and temporary, and pursuant to no intention to -relinquish domicile, constitutes subsequent return a new entry, subjecting the unsuspecting to exclusion or deportation. But the law is clear, and however cruel the result, we have no recourse but protest and recommendation.
The present appeal is by the Director of Immigration from an order discharging an alien from custody…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Claussen v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States Ex Rel. Klonis v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- United States Ex Rel. Ciccerelli v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- United States ex rel. Kowalenski v. FlynnDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927
- Jackson v. ZurbrickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Casa De Maryland, Incorporated v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States of America Ex Rel. Francesco Brancato v. John M. Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Paris v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.