Legal Opinion

Klusmann v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 10, 2025No. 5:24-cv-01295Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TODD KLUSMANN, Case No. 5:24-CV-1295 Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER THE AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1, et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendants Pending before this Court is the Motion for Discovery of Plaintiff Todd Klusmann (“Plaintiff” or “Klusmann”) filed on March 31, 2025 (“Plaintiff’s Motion”). (Doc. No. 21.) On April 30, 2025, Defendants AT&T Services, Inc. (“AT&T”) and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. (“Sedgwick”) (together, “Defendants”) filed a Brief in Opposition to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API