Legal Opinion

Detroit & Birmingham Plank-Road Co. v. Frazer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for 'mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order modifying an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Montgomery, J.. The-relator filed its bill-of complaint against the Detroit Suburban Railway Company and the Detroit Citizens* Street Railway Company, praying an injunction to restrain the defendants from laying a street-railway track along the line of complainant's roadbed. The bill alleges that such a construction by the defendants will interfere with its franchise, and will work irreparable injury. The defendants answered,- and set up that an agreement was made by complainant on the 29th of October, 1885, granting to defendants* predecessor the privilege of building a street railwaj1- for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Port Huron & Gratiot Railway Co. v. Judge of St. Clair CircuitMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids Electric Railway Co. v. Calhoun Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Baldwin v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Harbor Springs Lumber Co. v. Emmet Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Campau v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API