Hartline-Thomas, Inc. v. Arthur Pew Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
Summary judgment resulting from interpretation of an indemnification agreement. The parties have stipulated the facts and the only question for this court’s resolution is one of law.
The facts pertinent to the summary judgment show that Arthur Pew Construction Co., a general contractor, was engaged by Cobb County to construct a sewage plant. Pew subcontracted with Hartline-Thomas to perform all the painting. One of Hartline’s employees was overcome by fumes while painting in an enclosed area and fell, suffering injuries. The employee brought suit against Pew alleging negligence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Batson-Cook Co. v. Georgia Marble Setting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Binswanger Glass Co. v. Beers Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Aladdin, Inc. v. KrasnoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McEver v. Planners & Engineers Collaborative, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- ADC Construction Co. v. McDaniel Grading, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Walls, Inc. v. Atlantic Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Dan J. Sheehan Co. v. Ceramic Technics, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- L & B Construction Co. v. Ragan Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.