Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beinor v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 2011No. 10CA1685Published

1Dissent

Judge GABRIEL

dissenting.

I agree with the majority's conclusion that the medical use of marijuana by an employee holding a registry card under article XVIII, section 14 of the Colorado Constitution (medical marijuana amendment) is not pursuant to a prescription and therefore does not constitute the use of "medically prescribed controlled substances" within the meaning of section 8-78-108(5)(e) (IX.5), C.R.S8.2010. The question thus becomes whether application of section 8-78-108(5)(e) (IX.5) to deny claimant benefits here violated the medical marijuana amendment. The majority holds that it did…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API