Legal Opinion

Clark v. United Fruit Distributing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1929No. Docket No. 6589PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

This is an action for damages. The cause was tried with a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant United Fruit Distributing Company for the sum of $2,500. From the judgment entered thereon said defendant appeals.

Appellants urge several points upon this appeal. The first of these is that there is a material variance between the allegations of the amended complaint and the proof. There are nine separate causes of action set forth in the amended complaint. The first six causes of action are based upon similar contracts which differ…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hoover v. WolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. BelmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API