Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Elliott

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1923No. 11,643PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, C. J.

The trial court overruled appellant’s motions asking for a new trial and for a modification of the judgment. These rulings are assigned as errors. The only reason for a new trial presented is that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence. We do not deem it necessary to discuss the evidence; it is enough to say that we have carefully examined the same,- and find that the court’s decision is in all things sustained thereby.

The motion to modify the judgment was not to correct a mere clerical error, but called for a material alteration of an essential judicatory part of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. CurtisIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Cauthorn v. BierhausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Johnson v. ForemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., TrusteeIndiana Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API