Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Ohio
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 7, 2006No. 1:03 CV 2218PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
POLSTER, District Judge.
The above-captioned case is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (“R & R”) (ECF No. 68). Pending is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by Petitioner Charles Marshall (“Marshall” or “Petitioner”). ECF No. 1 (“Petition”). The Magistrate Judge considered Marshall’s claims and recommended that the habeas petition be denied. Petitioner filed objections, ECF No. 71, and the State filed a response to the objections, ECF No. 76.
Given the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CatesMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MarshallOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. BoganOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. CatesMontana Supreme Court · 2009