Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heer v. Thola

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 6, 2000No. 98-2282Published

1DissentCady, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

I would affirm the district court and the court of appeals. The Heers’ claim arose independent of the trustee’s deed and the statute of limitations under section 614.14(5) does not apply.

Under section 614.14(5), “an adverse claim arising ... by reason of a transfer of an interest in real estate by a trustee” must be brought within a year after the date of the recording of the deed “from which such claim may arise.” I agree with the majority that the claim of boundary by acquiescence falls within the legislative definition of an “adverse claim” under section 614.14(3).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. 2800 CORP. v. FernandezSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. Estate of Montag Ex Rel. Montag v. T H Agriculture & Nutrition Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. Egli v. TroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Schuder v. SchuderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Matter of Estate of RenwanzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API