Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Florida Bar re Frankel

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 13, 1991No. 76853Published

1Concurrence

McDONALD, Justice,

specially concurring.

I concur in the result reached by the majority opinion. I disagree only in the delineation of the scope of permissible lobbying activities of The Florida Bar. As I stated in my dissent in The Florida Bar re Schwarz, 552 So.2d 1094, 1098 (Fla.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 371, 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990), lobbying activities of The Florida Bar cannot extend beyond the following five designated areas:(1) Questions concerning the regulation and discipline of attorneys;(2) matters relating to the improvement of the functioning of the courts, judicial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keller v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Schwarz v. Florida Supreme CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Florida Bar re SchwarzSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API