Legal Opinion
Couse v. Canal Authority
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 31, 1967No. I-332PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
RAWLS, Chief Judge.
Petitioners seek to review by certiorari an order of taking entered in an eminent domain proceeding instituted by respondent. We are here confronted with respondent’s motion to dismiss upon the principal grounds that the controverted order is an interlocutory order in a law action and is not reviewable by certiorari.
The order of taking granted possession of the lands sought to be condemned to respondent upon the condition that a designated sum of money be deposited in the registry of the court, which deposit was duly made. Thus, possession and title to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brooks v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Howard Johnson, Inc. v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Wilson v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- State Road Department v. BainbridgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Duval Connecting RailroadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
3Cited by9 opinions
- Camp Phosphate Co. v. Marion CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Seadade Industries, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Trien v. Dade County ex rel. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Silver Springs, Inc. v. Canal AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Arp v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.