Legal Opinion

Whitehurst v. Estes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 21, 1944No. 13559PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

The suit of plaintiff (appellant) in the trial court was in the nature of a bill of review to set aside and hold for naught a judgment of foreclosure dated July 13, 1936, granted by the 101st District Court of Dallas County in Cause No. 19080-E, styled Mrs. O. M. Word et vir. v. J. M. Whitehurst, covering lot 3, block 4, Sunset Hill Addition to the City of Dallas; and to remove cloud cast upon title to the property by said judgment and the deed of trust therein ordered foreclosed. Mrs. Word, original plaintiff in cause No. 19080, was made party defendant to the instant suit,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nichols v. DibrellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Switzer v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Harn v. PhelpsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Wade v. WadeTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Nevins v. McKeeTexas Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Van v. WebbTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Potka v. PotkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Kieke v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Tatum v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API