Hittl v. Buckhout
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArthur D. Brennan, J.
In this preceding, brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, the petitioners apply for an order directing the respondent village officials to correct the minutes of the Village Board of Trustees so as to show that a certain amendment with respect to the zoning ordinance of the respondent village was, in fact, not adopted. On October 28, 1957, the Board of Trustees voted 3 to 2 for the adoption of a resolution changing the local building zone ordinance and the local use district map whereby the property of one, Porcello, was placed in a residence “ C ” district.
The respondents…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lawrence Constr. Corp. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burns v. City Council of City of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- B. R. M. Realty Corp. v. FlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Eadie v. Town Board of North GreenbushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Hittl v. BuckhoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- August v. City of Pompano Beach, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.