Legal Opinion

Fort Smith School District v. Deer/Mt. Judea School District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 20, 2014No. CV-14-576PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL E. DANIELSON, Associate Justice.

| Appellants Fort Smith School District; Greenwood School District; Alma School District; and Van Burén School District (collectively “Fort Smith”), appeal from the circuit court’s order denying their motion to intervene as a matter of right in the litigation of appellee Deer/Mt. Judea School District (“Deer/Mt. Judea”). 1 The sole point on appeal is that the circuit court erred in denying intervention as a matter of right. This court has previously recognized a right to appeal from the denial of a motion to intervene as a matter of right under Arkansas…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Billabong Products, Inc. v. Orange City BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. UHS of Arkansas, Inc. v. City of SherwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Cupples Farms Partnership v. Forrest City Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Deer/Mt. Judea School District v. KimbrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. BassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Bennett Scott "Storm" Nolan II and River Valley Production, LLC, D/B/A River Valley Relief Cultivation v. 2600 Holdings, LLC, D/B/A Southern Roots CultivationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
  3. Aldo Gastelum v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025
  4. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. BassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Wartick v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API