Legal Opinion

Railway Advertising Co. v. Sire

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 15, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment in favor of- plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCarthy, P. J.

The first point to consider in this case is whether the allegation in the' answer is a sufficient denial of the contract alleged by the plaintiff or not.

If it is, then there, is sufficient reason why, among others, it should be reversed. <

The plaintiff' alleges that on or about September 1st, 1897, among other things a contract in writing was entered into between plaintiff and defendant. The defendant. requested the plaintiff to insert his advertising cards in one-third of the cars on. certain street railways in the city of New, York, mentioned in said contract, for the term of three months,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pittenger v. Southern Tier Masonic Relief Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Punnett Cycle Mfg. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API