Legal Opinion

Ballentine v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 6, 1990No. A89A2022PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Frederick Ballentine brings this appeal from his conviction of five counts of child molestation, following the denial of his motion for a new trial.

1. Appellant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial because a regular juror was improperly replaced by an alternate juror during jury deliberations.

Jury selection and voir dire occurred nine days before trial. Appellant did not object to the constitution of the jury or improper jury deliberation until he filed a motion for a new trial four months after trial. At the motion hearing, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Proctor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Coker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Keri v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Timberlake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. State v. CanupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. State v. SeigniousCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API