Legal Opinion
Julian v. Hoosier Drill Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1881No. 8703PublishedCited by 14 opinions
From the Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Morris, C.
The appellant brought this suit against The Hoosier Drill Company, to recover damages for an alleged infringement of her rights to the use of the word “ Hoosier,” as a trade-mark. John Ingels, as the administrator of Joseph Ingels, who refused to join with the appellant as plaintiff, was made a defendant to answer as to the interest of his intestate in the suit.
The first paragraph of the complaint states, that the appellant’s assignor, Joseph Ingels, prior to the 20th day of March, 1876, invented and discovered certain new and useful inventions and improvements in grain drills, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. SpearThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849
- Congress & Empire Spring Co. v. High Rock Congress Spring Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Taylor v. CarpenterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1844
- Taylor v. CarpenterNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
3Cited by14 opinions
- Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Neva-Wet Corp. of America, Inc. v. Never Wet Processing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Tennant v. DunlopSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. HartogensisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Burt v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.