Legal Opinion
Rome Savings Bank v. B.W. Husted & Son. Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to defendants, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant Husted granted plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase an .11 acre parcel. Subsequently, defendant Senpike offered to purchase a 1.6 acre parcel that included the .11 acre parcel. The offer provided for payment of a $350,000 purchase price, but did not allocate a portion of that price to the .11 acre parcel to which plaintiff held a right of first refusal. After Husted’s attorney notified plaintiff of Senpike’s offer, plaintiff purported to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- LIN Broadcasting Corp. v. Metromedia, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- New Atlantic Garden, Inc. v. Atlantic Garden Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- New Atlantic Garden, Inc. v. Atlantic Garden Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- K.S. & S. Restaurant Corp. v. YarbroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Tarallo v. Norstar BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- USA Cable v. World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- New York Tile Wholesale Corp. v. Thomas Fatato Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Johnnies Pelham Road Service, Inc. v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- McQuillan v. Engelman, No. X06-Cv-99-0153482s (May 15, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000