Legal Opinion
Davis v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 10, 2015No. 15-608Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
3Jn tbe Wniteb ~tates QCourt of jfeberal QClaims No. 15-608C FILED (Filed: July 10, 2015) JUL 1 0 2015 ) CHELSEA L. DAVIS, ) U.S. COURT OF ) FEDERAL CLAIMS Plaintiff, ) ) Pro Se; Rule 12(h)(3); Lack of Subject- v. ) Matter Jurisdiction; Rule 12(b)(l); ) Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; 28 U.S.C. § THE UNITED STATES, ) 1500. ) Defendant. ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ) Chelsea L. Davis, Dallas, Texas, Plaintiff pro se. Michael D. Austin, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.