Legal Opinion

People v. Chavis

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert G. Seewald, J.

The defendant’s mere filing of a CPL 250.10 (2) notice does not constitute a waiver of the defendant’s physician-patient privilege (see, CPLR 4504), the trial court held in People v Gorman (123 Misc 2d 370 [1984]). As a result the People and their psychiatric expert were precluded from obtaining and reviewing the defendant’s relevant medical records in preparation for examination of the defendant.

The issue here is whether Gorman (supra) is still viable, as asserted by the defendant, in view of the opinion rendered by the Court of Appeals 12 years later…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. TortoriciNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. People v. BerkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. EdneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. SegalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. AlmonorNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. S.M. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API