Friedel, Admx. v. Wolfle

Apparently the court below took the view that inasmuch as Emma Friedel, as administratrix, did not become a creditor until the judgment was rendered, there could be no transfer to defraud creditors. That this was the view of the court is apparent from the citation of the cases in the brief filed by defendant in error.

Of course the plaintiff in error, the plaintiff in the action below, was not actually a creditor at the time the transfer of the property on the 11th of November 1926 was made. At best she then had only a cause of action. She afterwards became a credit- or, and so was a…