Legal Opinion
State v. McFarland
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1910No. 8866PublishedCited by 27 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered April 15, 1910, upon a trial and conviction of refusing to pay a hotel inspection fee.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
On April 1, 1910, the prosecuting attorney of Snohomish county filed an information against the defendant, George McFarland, which contained the following charge;
“That on or about the 3d day of March, 1910, in the county of Snohomish, state of Washington, the above named defendant, George McFarland, was the person in charge of the certain hotel commonly known and designated as the ‘Mitchell Hotel’, in the city of Everett, county of Snohomish, state of Washington; that said Mitchell Hotel then and there was a hotel containing more than twenty (20) rooms and less than one hundred (100) rooms…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- State ex rel. Board of Courthouse & City Hall Com'rs v. CooleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Hubbell v. HigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bacich v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- Shapiro Bros. Shoe Co. v. Lewiston-Auburn Shoeworkers Protective Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- State v. Bowen & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. EnloeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.