Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Solkav Solartechnik, Ges. M.B.H.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 16, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
White, J.
In 1981, petitioner, an Austrian corporation, entered into a *96license and distribution agreement with respondent’s predecessor which included an arbitration clause providing as follows: "Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Licensing Agreement Arbitration Rules of The American Arbitration Association”.
In July 1991, respondent filed a demand for arbitration alleging that petitioner had defaulted in royalty payments. Thereafter, the American Arbitration…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Savasta v. 470 Newport AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Professional Staff Congress/City University of New York v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In the Arbitration between S. Wiener Furniture Co. & Kingston City Schools ConsolidatedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Solkav Solartechnik, G.M.B.H. & Besicorp Group Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re the Arbitration between Thompson & S.L.T. Ready-MixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & CavanaghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Arbitration between Povinelli & Royal InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1997