Legal Opinion
Eubanks v. Anderson
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 19, 2007No. 104,599PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant, Sheryll Anderson, appeals the trial court’s denial of her request for a temporary injunction. Based upon the facts and the law, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 This case involves a boundary line dispute between two neighbors in rural Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Defendant’s property is immediately to the north of, and adjacent to, property owned by Plaintiffs, Calvin Eu-banks and Naomi Eubanks (collectively, “the Eubanks”). The properties are separated by a fence consisting of pig panels and one strand of barb wire (the “pig fence”). The pig fence is located…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Amoco Production Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Lewis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Jackson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Lake Ex Rel. Benton v. CrosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hernandez v. ReedCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- SALINAS v. v. SHEETSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017