Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Coleman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1923No. File No. 5148Published

Appeal from, Circuit 'Court, Tripp County; Hon. N. D. Burci-i, Judge. Manadamus by Lillian Meyers against Thomas Coleman, Sheriff of Tripp (County. Judgment for -defendant, and relator appeals. Appellant cited: Chesney v. Francisco, 12 Neb. 626, 12 N. W. 94; Robinson v. Hughes (Ind.

Read the full summary

Appeal from, Circuit 'Court, Tripp County; Hon. N. D. Burci-i, Judge. Manadamus by Lillian Meyers against Thomas Coleman, Sheriff of Tripp (County. Judgment for -defendant, and relator appeals. Appellant cited: Chesney v. Francisco, 12 Neb. 626, 12 N. W. 94; Robinson v. Hughes (Ind. Sup.), 20 N. E. 220; Rice v. Nolan, 33 Kan. 28, 5 Pac. 437; 'Daniels v. 'Hamilton, 52 Ala. 108; Thompson on Homestead! & Exemptions, 809; U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hollenshead ('Wash.), 98 Pac. 749; Boylston v. Rankin (Ala.), 21 So. 995; Stout v. Price, 56 N. E. 857; 'Commonwealth v. Burnette, 44 So'. 960;…

1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.

The sole question before this court: Was the claim for exemption on the part of the wife made within a reasonable time?

[1, 2] The husband having failed to assert the right, the wife was entitled to make such, claim. She made it within 22 days from the date of the levy. We hold that the claim was made within a reasonable time.

On the authority of Goodland v. Smejkal (S. D.), 190 N. W. 1017, this cause is reversed, with directions that the peremptory writ of mandamus be issuied, requiring the sheriff to restore to the relator the property claimed as exempt.

Note — Reported in 192 N. W. 184. See…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goodlad v. SmejkalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Pennington County v. Red Lake Drainage & Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API