Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Demagnassun

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1931No. Docket No. 178, Calendar No. 34,103PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Claiming that, in 1926, defendant De-Magnassun obtained their signatures to a deed by-trick, and, therefore, the instrument was no better than a forgery (Horvath v. National Mortgage Co., 238 Mich. 354 [56 A. L. R. 578]), plaintiffs filed the bill herein to have the deed adjudged void and subsequent purchasers without title.

The evidence does not admit of a finding that the signatures of plaintiffs were procured by trick or in a manner constituting- the deed, in effect, a forgery, but clearly establishes a fraud perpetrated by DeMagnassun and rendered possible by the gullibility and misplaced…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Horvath v. National Mortgage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Kuczewski v. De MagnussunMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leidel v. BallbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API