Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John H. Peiss

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2017No. 2016AP000663-DPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*83¶ 1.

2Per curiam

We review the report of Referee John B. Murphy recommending that Attorney John H. Peiss's license to practice law in Wisconsin should be revoked, as discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Illinois. Upon careful review of the matter, we accept the referee's recommendation. We also assess the costs of the proceeding, which are $2,026.90 as of December 28, 2016, against Attorney Peiss.

¶ 2. Attorney Peiss was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1982. He was also admitted to practice law in Illinois on March 6, 1992. Attorney Peiss's license to practice law in…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against PeissWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cedric Lamont Berry v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl J. SchwedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl J. SchwedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API