Legal Opinion

Roy E. Keough v. State of Tennessee

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2011No. W2008-01916-SC-R11-PDPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · ClarkCornelia A. Clark, C.J.

in which JANICE M. HOLDER, GARY R. WADE, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined.

We granted permission to appeal in this post-conviction capital case to consider whether the courts below erred in holding that the state and federal constitutional right against self-incrimination does not afford a post-conviction petitioner who chooses to testify the right to limit the scope of the State’s cross-examination. However, we need not decide whether and in what manner the constitutional right against self-incrimination applies in the post-conviction context because this appeal can…

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Vaughn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pylant v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. William Caldwell Hancock v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Brian C. Frelix v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
  3. Carolyn Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. - DissentingTennessee Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Christopher M. Heath v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  5. Eddie Medlock v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API