Legal Opinion

United States v. James P. Sanderson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1956No. 15050_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

One Eng Kam arrived in the United States in 1948. He claimed admission as a son of a veteran of the United States armed forces under provisions of the Immigration Act then in force.1 He was given a hearing before the local Board of Special Inquiry of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and on October 26, 1948, the said Board found that he had not sustained his burden of proving the alleged relationship, and rejected his application for admission. From the ruling an administrative appeal was taken.

Appellee Sanderson, Eng Kam’s attorney, secured his release from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. NordenholzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. United States v. CapuaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  4. Matta v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1929
  5. Kavounas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Glens Falls Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. United States v. James P. SandersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API