Legal Opinion
Rochester Savings Bank v. Foltz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 9, 1898Published
Actions by the Rochester Savings Bank against Moses Foltz and Beaman Catto, and the Commercial Bank against Beaman Catto and others.
1Opinion of the Court
No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs, and with $10 costs of the motion in each case. See 54 N. Y. Supp. 764.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commercial Bank v. FoltzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898