Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 26, 1930No. A-7216PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendants, were, by information filed in the district court of Seminole county, charged that the defendants did then and there unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously make a connection with a certain tank and pipe line used for the storage and conduct of gas, crude oil, naphtha, and casinghead gas, the property of the Magnolia Petroleum Co., a corporation; they were convicted, and the defendant Carl Smith was sentenced to be confined in the state penitentiary at McAlester, for a term of one year and six months, and the defendant L. B.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State ex rel. City of Terre Haute v. KolsemIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Shires v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. State v. CoyleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bond v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Gorum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Bonicelli v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. One Chicago Coin's Play Boy Marble Board, No. 19771 v. State ex rel. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API